Science

Science for All: A new breed of schools is closing achievement gaps among students and may hold the key to a revitalized 21st-century workforce

Lynch, S.J. (2015, Aug. 1). Science for All: A new breed of schools is closing achievement gaps among students and may hold the key to a revitalized 21st-century workforce. Scientific American. Retrieved from: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-for-all/

Author/Presenter

Sharon J. Lynch

Lead Organization(s)
Year
2015
Short Description

Professional development aligned with AP Chemistry curriculum: Promoting science practices and facilitating enduring conceptual understanding

The recent revisions to the advanced placement (AP) chemistry curriculum promote deep conceptual understanding of chemistry content over more rote memorization of facts and algorithmic problem solving. For many teachers, this will mean moving away from traditional worksheets and verification lab activities that they have used to address the vast amounts of content in the AP chemistry course. Moreover, a substantial shift in teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning of chemistry will be needed to facilitate the transformation of their instructional practices.

Author/Presenter

Deborah G. Herrington

Ellen J. Yezierski

Year
2014
Short Description

Examining Elementary School Science Achievement Gaps Using an Organizational and Leadership Perspective

There is the tendency to explain away successful urban schools as indicative of the heroic efforts by a tireless individual, effectively blaming schools that underperform for a lack of grit and dedication. This study reports the development of a research instrument (School Science Infrastructure, or SSI) and then applying that tool to an investigation of equitable science performance by elementary schools.

Author/Presenter

John Settlage

Malcolm B. Butler

Julianne Wenner

Lara K. Smetana

Betsy McCoach

Lead Organization(s)
Year
2015

The 8 Elements of Inclusive STEM High Schools: Findings from the STEM School Study

The STEM School Study (S3) team sat down with inclusive STEM school leaders from over 25 inclusive STEM schools and asked them to describe the parts of their schools that are essential to their school models. We found that while STEM schools vary in many ways, there are eight major Elements common to them all. Each Element is comprised of a number of components and together, they illustrate what STEM schools are and lay the groundwork for understanding how STEM schools work to achieve their goals.

Author/Presenter

Melanie LaForce

Elizabeth Noble

Heather King

Sandra Holt

Jeanne Century

Year
2014

Towards Domain-Independent Assessment of Elementary Students’ Science Competency using Soft Cardinality

Automated assessment of student learning has become the subject of increasing attention. Students’ textual responses to short answer questions offer a rich source of data for assessment. However, automatically analyzing textual constructed responses poses significant computational challenges, exacerbated by the disfluencies that occur prominently in elementary students’ writing. With robust text analytics, there is the potential to analyze a student’s text responses and accurately predict his or her future success.

Author/Presenter

Samuel P. Leeman-Munk

Angela Shelton

Eric N. Wiebe

James C. Lester

Year
2014
Short Description

This paper presents a novel application of the soft cardinality text analytics method to support assessment of text.

Assessing Elementary Students' Science Competency with Text Analytics

Real-time formative assessment of student learning has become the subject of increasing attention. Students’ textual responses to short answer questions offer a rich source of data for formative assessment. However, automatically analyzing textual constructed responses poses significant computational challenges, and the difficulty of generating accurate assessments is exacerbated by the disfluencies that occur prominently in elementary students’ writing. With robust text analytics, there is the potential to accurately analyze students’ text responses and predict students’ future success.

Author/Presenter

Samuel P. Leeman-Munk

Eric N. Wiebe

James C. Lester

Year
2014
Short Description

This paper presents WriteEval, a hybrid text analytics method for analyzing student-constructed responses.

SketchMiner: Mining Learner-Generated Science Drawings with Topological Abstraction

Mining learner generated sketches holds significant potential for acquiring deep insight into learners’ mental models. Drawing has been shown to benefit both learning outcomes and engagement, and learners’ sketches offer a rich source of diagnostic information. Unfortunately, interpreting learners’ sketches—even sketches comprised of semantically grounded symbols—poses significant computational challenges.

Author/Presenter

Andy Smith

Eric Wiebe

Bradford Mott

James Lester

Year
2014
Short Description

This paper introduces SketchMiner, which uses drawing topologies to automatically interpret learner-generated sketches.

Scaffolding Argumentation about Water Quality: A Mixed-method Study in a Rural Middle School

A common way for students to develop scientific argumentation abilities is through argumentation about socioscientific issues, defined as scientific problems with social, ethical, and moral aspects. Computer-based scaffolding can support students in this process. In this mixed method study, we examined the use and impact of computer based scaffolding to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments during a 3-week problem-based learning unit focused on the water quality of a local river.

Author/Presenter

Brian R. Belland

Jiangyue Gu

Sara Armbrust

Brant Cook

Lead Organization(s)
Year
2015
Short Description

In this mixed method study, we examined the use and impact of computer based scaffolding to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments during a 3-week problem-based learning unit focused on the water quality of a local river. We found a significant and substantial impact on the argument evaluation ability of lower-achieving students, and preliminary evidence of an impact on argument evaluation ability among low-SES students. We also found that students used the various available support—computer-based scaffolding, teacher scaffolding, and groupmate support—in different ways to counter differing challenges. We then formulated changes to the scaffolds on the basis of research results.